lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Prioritized I/O
Date
From
Steven Suson writes:
> I've been thinking about the discussions on latency, especially in
> regards to multilmedia recording, etc. If I/O were prioritized in the
> way that CPU utilization is, then this would allow R/T processes to also
> take precendence for I/O, thus reducing latency. In addition, this
> yields all sorts of benefits for time sensitive I/O.
>
> Any thoughts? Opinions? Etc.?

I prototyped something like this in SunOS years ago. It was a big win
for responsiveness because I used it to make executable pagefaults have
higher priority than writes.

It never went in because there are fairness issues - consider a system
generating a lot of dirty pages and you are giving reads higher priority.
The system grinds to a halt. I never solved that part of the problem.

Anyway, there is an easy way to do this - every operating system has a
disk queue with pending disk I/Os. Just turn that into multiple queues.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.046 / U:38.440 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site