Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 Jun 1999 08:56:13 -0500 (CDT) | From | Nate Riffe <> | Subject | Re: TCP/PPP bug 2.3.5? |
| |
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Nate Riffe wrote: > .... > > filled to capacity and stays there until the transfer is complete. I > > think this is a network stack problem and not a hardware problem because > > ping -f gets 0% packet loss (one run lost 10 packets out of 60,000). This > > only happens with bulk transfer, interactive sessions are perfectly fine. > > "ping -f" uses small frames, try using LARGE frames like > bulk TCP datastream does. > > ping -f -s 1480 dest.host > > what happens ? > > Very likely you have hardware problems at the cabeling, > or at the network switch.
No, I tried that two. The packet loss is still 0%.
> > > -Nate > > Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as > > inkblot@geocities.com sticky. > > /Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi> >
------------------------------------------------((\))<---------------------- Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as inkblot@geocities.com sticky.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/IT/M/S/O d-@ s-:- a--->- C++ UL++++BS++>$ P+>+++ L+++>+++++$ W+ N !o K- w(---)$>-- M-(--) V(--) PS+ PE Y+ PGP>++ t(+)@ 5 X@ R tv>! b+>+++ DI++ D e>++(+++) h r++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |