Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 03:33:08 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers) |
| |
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote: > What gets me is there are people saying khttpd is a good idea, when its > reporting lower performance than a user space httpd and who are anti-devfs
I find khttpd is a reasonable idea. I dont know what youre talking about with "lower performance than a user space httpd", http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ seems to indicate otherwise -- what performance measurements were you looking at? B)
Remember that the current khttpd is basically proof of concept and actually approaches zeus performance wise -- and they werent even trying very hard!
Now if you plug khttpd in front of apache the advantages become obvious. Apache isnt exactly a speed demon -- but with khttpd it could be.
We want to kick M$' ass as much as possible in the performance arena. khttpd is one way to do it.
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |