Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:28:49 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs) |
| |
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote: > > I find khttpd is a reasonable idea. I dont know what youre talking about > > with "lower performance than a user space httpd", > > http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ seems to indicate otherwise -- what > > performance measurements were you looking at? B) > phhttpd.
You mean phttpd? Has anyone got benchmarks of phttpd vs khttpd?
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |