Messages in this thread | | | From | "Davide Libenzi" <> | Subject | Re: New semaphore __wake_up() implementation ... | Date | Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:59:56 +0200 |
| |
>wait a sec, what about starvation issues ? if the semaphore is used for >resource counting then it's ok. but if it is used as a mutex then we're >in trouble. LIFO is unacceptable, FIFO might have priority inversion. >calculating goodness() on all the processes in the waitqueue and picking >the winner sounds like the way to go, IMHO. >
Agree.
Davide.
-- "Debian, the Freedom in Freedom"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |