Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:30:26 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Ivan Popov <> | Subject | Re: NCR5380 stuff |
| |
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok how does this look. I think this correctly interprets the 2,0 drivers > intention unlike 2.2 which as you pointed out got the one case of > USLEEP/NCR5380_main wrong
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock, flags); > run_main(); > + spin_unlock_irqsave(&io_request_lock); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I suppose it should be spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, flags)
??
-- Ivan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |