Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Dec 1999 01:47:17 -0900 (AKST) | From | "Christopher E. Brown" <> | Subject | Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet? |
| |
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Vladislav Malyshkin wrote:
> I use mulipath routing for that. Install ip program from Alexey > Kuznetsov iproute-2.2.4-2 package (on RedHat 6.1) then entablish > all your ppp links WITHOUT default route set in ppp configuration. > then
> /sbin/ip route add default nexthop via gateway.number.1.ip > dev ppp0 nexthop via gateway.number.2.ip dev ppp1 nexthop via > gateway.number.2.ip dev ppp2 > > all these things I handle by scripts in > /etc/ppp/ip-up.local /etc/ppp/ip-down.local > > when you do > /sbin/ip route list > you will see default routing as multipath routing: > > default > nexthop via 10.65.60.12 dev ppp1 weight 1 > nexthop via 10.65.60.12 dev ppp0 weight 1 > > It works, but it is not perfect. > Some times it does not do good balancing.
As a followup to my prev message, the patch *is* part of the diffserv package, and the command would be
/sbin/ip route add default equalize nexthop via gateway.number.1.ip \ dev ppp0 nexthop via gateway.number.2.ip dev ppp1
/sbin/ip route list gets you default equalize nexthop via 10.65.60.12 dev ppp1 weight 1 nexthop via 10.65.60.12 dev ppp0 weight 1
--- As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches, and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough... --About the Internet and nuclear war.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |