lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Bloat? (khttpd)
* Dwayne C . Litzenberger said:

> > Performance. The apache/khttpd combo beats the shit out of NT in most
> > benchmarks.
>
> Maybe so, but why don't we put Quake into the kernel, too? You would get
> great performance, but something like that simply belongs in user space. I
> don't think Linux deserves the benchmarks it gets if it cheats to get
> them. We shouldn't let politics allow us to employ bad design (If a
> registry ala Windows was a performance issue, would we use it? No,
> because it makes a mess of everything).
>
> An HTTP server is something that should be in a patch, not the main kernel
> tree. (Heck, software suspend and the PC-speaker driver should go in
> before khttpd does.)
Come on, I don't understand the noise. You don't like it, you don't use it.
After all compiling it in is OPTIONAL, right?

marek
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.100 / U:0.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site