Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:31:54 -0700 | From | Richard Gooch <> | Subject | Re: Bloat? (khttpd) |
| |
H. Peter Anvin writes: > Followup to: <19991223013142.F3089@uni-mainz.de> > By author: Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:58:16PM -0600, Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote: > > > Does someone have Linus's take on why on earth he let something that > > > should definitely be in user-space (the httpd) into the kernel? It seems > > > absurd to me, and odd that Linus would allow it. > > > > Performance. The apache/khttpd combo beats the shit out of NT in most > > benchmarks. > > > > Performance, and *modularity*. khttpd doesn't affect anything else in > the kernel, and so is a rather harmless optional feature.
I've seen this question raised before, but I don't recall seeing a definitive answer. How does khttpd compare with phttpd?
Regards,
Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |