lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Bloat? (khttpd)
H. Peter Anvin writes:
> Followup to: <19991223013142.F3089@uni-mainz.de>
> By author: Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:58:16PM -0600, Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote:
> > > Does someone have Linus's take on why on earth he let something that
> > > should definitely be in user-space (the httpd) into the kernel? It seems
> > > absurd to me, and odd that Linus would allow it.
> >
> > Performance. The apache/khttpd combo beats the shit out of NT in most
> > benchmarks.
> >
>
> Performance, and *modularity*. khttpd doesn't affect anything else in
> the kernel, and so is a rather harmless optional feature.

I've seen this question raised before, but I don't recall seeing a
definitive answer. How does khttpd compare with phttpd?

Regards,

Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.194 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site