[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: spin_unlock optimization(i386)
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> The purpose of the lock prefix is not to make the current CPU operation
> atomic. It's to make all other CPUs halt until the operation is complete.
> This gurantees that only one CPU modifies the variable at the same
> time. You are not going to do that with a move.

AFAIK the reason the lock prefix is not permitted with move instructions
is that there's no need. Lock makes read-modify-write instructions
atomic. Aligned writes are atomic already.

-- Jamie

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.027 / U:95.760 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site