lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: spin_unlock optimization(i386)
    Richard B. Johnson wrote:
    > The purpose of the lock prefix is not to make the current CPU operation
    > atomic. It's to make all other CPUs halt until the operation is complete.
    > This gurantees that only one CPU modifies the variable at the same
    > time. You are not going to do that with a move.

    AFAIK the reason the lock prefix is not permitted with move instructions
    is that there's no need. Lock makes read-modify-write instructions
    atomic. Aligned writes are atomic already.

    -- Jamie

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.019 / U:38.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site