Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) ) | Date | Sat, 09 Oct 1999 08:43:44 -0400 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910081626080.24609-100000@orville.yi.org>, Gorky wri tes: +----- | I suspect I am not the only one who has been entirely put off to devfs by | the behaviour of Shawn Leas. The kernel is a technical issue, and this +--->8
The behavior of Horst von Brand (specifically, outright ignoring that his thread started *because* of USB dynamic devices and instead repeatedly asserting that nobody needs dynamic devices) hasn't done anything for the anti-devfs side.
The pissing match is going on on both sides. Ignore the pissers and get on with the technical details already. Making technical decisions based on the behavior of a few idiots ("there is no cause so good that one cannot find an idiot championing it" or something like that --- which applies to both sides of this discussion) is an even worse idea.
-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |