lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) )
Date
From
In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910081626080.24609-100000@orville.yi.org>, Gorky 
wri
tes:
+-----
| I suspect I am not the only one who has been entirely put off to devfs by
| the behaviour of Shawn Leas. The kernel is a technical issue, and this
+--->8

The behavior of Horst von Brand (specifically, outright ignoring that his
thread started *because* of USB dynamic devices and instead repeatedly
asserting that nobody needs dynamic devices) hasn't done anything for the
anti-devfs side.

The pissing match is going on on both sides. Ignore the pissers and get on
with the technical details already. Making technical decisions based on the
behavior of a few idiots ("there is no cause so good that one cannot find an
idiot championing it" or something like that --- which applies to both sides
of this discussion) is an even worse idea.

--
brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.285 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site