Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Oct 1999 19:44:04 -0400 (EDT) | From | Stephen Frost <> | Subject | Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation) |
| |
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others > > happier about letting devfs be in the kernel.. > > There are certain people who dont want options available to end users.
If you would elaborate and give reasons, I might give that some thought. Just putting that claim out there is useless however. Do you feel this way? If so, why? If you speak for others, what are their reasons, and why are they not speaking?
Stephen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |