Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Oct 1999 18:59:53 -0400 (EDT) | From | Stephen Frost <> | Subject | Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation) |
| |
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net> said: > > [...] > > > The persistance that devfsd adds is, as I recall, less than elegant. > > A better solution would be nice, almost like a special kind of symlink, > > ...that has to stay around just like files in /dev do right now, ...
Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others happier about letting devfs be in the kernel..
Stephen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |