lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
    On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:

    > Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net> said:
    >
    > [...]
    >
    > > The persistance that devfsd adds is, as I recall, less than elegant.
    > > A better solution would be nice, almost like a special kind of symlink,
    >
    > ...that has to stay around just like files in /dev do right now, ...

    Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others
    happier about letting devfs be in the kernel..

    Stephen


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.043 / U:60.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site