lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:

> Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > The persistance that devfsd adds is, as I recall, less than elegant.
> > A better solution would be nice, almost like a special kind of symlink,
>
> ...that has to stay around just like files in /dev do right now, ...

Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others
happier about letting devfs be in the kernel..

Stephen


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans