[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:

> Stephen Frost <> said:
> [...]
> > The persistance that devfsd adds is, as I recall, less than elegant.
> > A better solution would be nice, almost like a special kind of symlink,
> ...that has to stay around just like files in /dev do right now, ...

Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others
happier about letting devfs be in the kernel..


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.060 / U:12.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site