lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: *** Draft 5 - Press Release ***
Date
In article <199901202048.HAA26011@usssv01.qantas.com.au>,
Matthew Hannigan <mha73@qantas.com.au> wrote:
> Year 2000 : Linux has always been year 2000 ready.

That's not strictly true; there were occasional 1901 bugs years ago.
Linux failed to work around certain buggy motherboards or limited clock
chips or something. I can't remember if they were in production or
development kernels though.

However, it has been Y2K ready for some years now.

--
Zygo Blaxell (with a name like that, who needs a nick?)
Linux Engineer (my favorite official job title so far)
Corel Corporation (whose opinions sometimes differ from those shown above)
zygob@corel.ca (also zblaxell@furryterror.org)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.029 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site