Messages in this thread | | | From | (Zygo Blaxell) | Subject | Re: *** Draft 5 - Press Release *** | Date | 21 Jan 1999 13:02:36 -0500 |
| |
In article <199901202048.HAA26011@usssv01.qantas.com.au>, Matthew Hannigan <mha73@qantas.com.au> wrote: > Year 2000 : Linux has always been year 2000 ready.
That's not strictly true; there were occasional 1901 bugs years ago. Linux failed to work around certain buggy motherboards or limited clock chips or something. I can't remember if they were in production or development kernels though.
However, it has been Y2K ready for some years now.
-- Zygo Blaxell (with a name like that, who needs a nick?) Linux Engineer (my favorite official job title so far) Corel Corporation (whose opinions sometimes differ from those shown above) zygob@corel.ca (also zblaxell@furryterror.org)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |