Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:32:34 +0100 (MET) | From | David Weinehall <> | Subject | RE: *** Draft 5 - Press Release *** |
| |
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Greaves Tristan TM wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Hannigan [mailto:mha73@qantas.com.au] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 4:39 AM > > To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > > Subject: Re: *** Draft 5 - Press Release *** > > > > And definitely don't mention y2k -- any mention > > of current "compliance" suggests former non-compliance. > > Not a good thing. > > No. y2k compliance *must* be mentioned. Anyone starting to > use a product nowadays will want to know whether it is compliant. > Not referring to it in a press release will appear a little > suspicious... > > It should be referred to, and also the fact that Linux has *always* > been compliant. That solves the problem. :)
Something like:
"Unlike many other Operating Systems, Linux has been Year 2000 compatible for almost xx years."
xx = 1.3 or so?!
/David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |