Messages in this thread | | | From | "Anthony Barbachan" <> | Subject | Re: Looking for definition of inw and/or __inw on x86 | Date | Tue, 8 Sep 1998 05:27:51 -0400 |
| |
I finally got the function definition. The problem was that I was compiling my modules with just a gcc -c modname.c. Since the inlined functions in asm/io.h are extern the compiler kept expecting a definition for __inw and __inwc. This leads to another question, why in the world are the INLINED functions in asm-i386/io.h declared as extern?
BTW, thanks to all those who helped.
-----Original Message----- From: Anthony Barbachan <barbacha@mail.cis.fordham.edu> To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> Date: Tuesday, September 08, 1998 3:07 AM Subject: Looking for definition of inw and/or __inw on x86
>I am writing a module for 2.0.35 which requires inw. I found inw in >asm-i386/io.h however that definition used __inw which I cannot find at all. >Can anybody tell me where either __inw or a "complete" definition of inw is >located. > >PS > > I think this is a bug since asm-i386/io.h uses __inw in its definition >of inw, it should have included the file that contained the definition of >__inw. > > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html
| |