[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux, UDI and SCO.
19-Sep-98 17:34 you wrote:
> Erik Corry wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 1998 at 10:31:26PM +0400, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> > In <> Erik Corry ( wrote:
>> >
>> > EC> But you can release a UDI driver simultaneously under two
>> > EC> different licenses. So everyone can be happy.
>> >
>> > Not at all. LGPL will be 100% enough for such purposes.
>> I see no way of forcing hardware manufacturers to use LGPL.
>> The only way would seem to be to not put UDI in the official
>> kernel, but there are sure to be distributions that put it
>> in anyway (Xi graphics will, I would guess) and individuals
>> will always be free to do so.

> Ummmmm.... That's really easy. 1st case: change the kernel license to
> disallow commercial drivers. 2nd case: change the module code to only
> load drivers containing the right string in the right place. That
> string would of course be a protected certification mark. These are
> sort of ugly and rude. Can anyone think of something nicer?

This is not really needed. Inclusion of OSD-compiance in USD-certification
will be enough :-) Since "Big Boss" (who will sign checks :-) is aware that
certified driver is "Good Thing" while non-certified driver is "Bad Thing"
(even if he is not aware what's driver is in first place :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.124 / U:12.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site