lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: kill -9 <pid of X>
From
Date
>>>>> "Jon" == Jon M Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu> writes:

Jon> On 13 Aug 1998, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> No in user space - fbdev may use accel for things that can speed
>> up the console code, like recangular blitting and clearing, it does
>> not intend to provide some generic kernel accel API.

Jon> But is has in fact done so, by allowing for driver-specific
Jon> ioctls. That is one thing those ioctls be be used for.

Its possible, but it was not the intention.

>> When you want to have accel control in user space, you tell fbdev
>> and it wont use acceleration for the console until the user space
>> program finishes with it.

Jon> I assume by "user space" you mean X primarily.

Or something like libGGI.

>> We did not do that on purpose, ioctl == context switch and we
>> don't want that.

Jon> direct userspace access to accel registers == unsafe. *I*
Jon> don't want *that*. You can get quite acceptable speed out of
Jon> ioctls. Not the most speed possible, but in most cases that
Jon> isn't a concern.

Sorry, tough.

If you want to run X on broken hardware then you'll have to take the
risk. A context switch is not acceptable here and much worse, it will
require you to implement a zillion drivers for acceleration of various
chipsets which will lead to unnecessary code bloat.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.069 / U:7.708 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site