Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:10:06 -0400 | From | Paul Barton-Davis <> | Subject | Re: archive access |
| |
Although I want to agree with the complaints about people downloading kernel tarballs, I also want to pass on the following observation.
I've had close to 12 years doing system level work with Unix systems. I've written several device drivers, thread packages, fundamentally rewritten the entire notion of scheduling in Mach, administered networks of 100's of workstations, run and programmed big parallel systems, and so forth.
Last week, to get my kernel from 2.1.106 to 2.1.110, I downloaded the relevant 4 patch files, and proceeded to apply them. Now, I don't claim to be a wizard with patch(1), but its not exactly a new tool to me.
What happened ? It completely destroyed my kernel tree. I don't know why - perhaps the existence of a symlink as the top of my kernel tree (linux -> linux-2.1.1.06), perhaps some missing options to patch. I ended up with every *new* file since 2.1.106 present in /usr/src/linux. I considered backing out the patches with patch -R, and then realized that this wouldn't necessarily work correctly either.
So, I got on the line, and sucked down 2.1.110. It took about 6.5hrs. It sucked, but what was the alternative ? I'm sure there was one, and in fact, I'd love to understand what happened. But consider this situation for someone who is a little newer to this stuff than me.
--pbd
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |