Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:27:31 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Albert D. Cahalan" <> | Subject | Re: [IDEA] Developers: your opinion badly needed ! (Was: [PATCH] /proc/config.gz) |
| |
Horst von Brand writes: > [trimmed] >> On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 09:40:45PM +0200, Riccardo Facchetti wrote:
>>> This evening I have posted the patch for the System.map only. >>> In the next days, if I see that there is some interest, >>> I can include the .config data too. > > Yet again: This is only useful (in general) if you have several kernels,
Stop thinking only about yourself. There are lots of people that don't understand the importance of having a correct System.map in the right location under the right filename. These people produce bogus oops reports which waste kernel developer's time and dilute crash patterns.
> and then the problem is just shifted form "Which .config/System.map/etc > file goes with the running kernel" to "Which one is the running kernel".
/proc/ksyms_internal
> Folks, it is much harder to trim out unneeded stuff than adding yet > another cool feature that just the author and his buddies use.
Agreed, but you will be using this. At least procps, klogd, and ksymoops will be modified to use symbols provided by the kernel.
I expect the 2.2 kernel to be popular at least until winter 2001. It's going to be used by 10 million people, many of whom have no clue about why a System.map file is important. These people will make feeble attempts at bug reporting. One thing they will have is enough RAM to make System.map totally insignificant. Think in terms of an average consumer PC with hundreds of MB of RAM.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |