Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 31 Jan 1998 13:43:21 +0000 | From | "Mike Tubby G8TIC (Linux Account)" <> | Subject | Re: transparent proxy not operationalal in 2.1 |
| |
At 21:28 30/01/98 +0300, you wrote: >In article <19980130161326.43332@math.fu-berlin.de> you wrote: >: Yes, I know, I have found a few mailing list archives about transparent >: proxying that say that it is inoperational in 2.1, but apparently nobody >: bothers? The mails indicated that it's broken for over a _year_ now and >: it still does not work. Can this be? Does nobody use transparent >: proxying? > >Yes, you are the first who is bothered by it >(at least in this mailing list) >Nobody asked to repair it, so that I saw no reasons to be bothered too :-) >If new socket hashing scheme did not break it too, I can repair it. >But I need someone who is ready to test it. > >Alexey Kuznetsov >
Just to put my hand up on this one! Transparrent Proxy is *VERY* *VERY* important to me and several organisations that I build and maintain Linux boxes for.
No Transparrent Proxy = No Linux! Well, actually means staying with Linux 2.0 - so, please fix it!!!!!!!!!
Regards
Mike
-- Michael J Tubby B.Sc. G8TIC Technical Director, Thorcom Systems Limited Tel: 01 905 756700 (intl: +44 1 905 756 700) Fax: 01 905 755777 (intl: +44 1 905 755 777) Web: http://www.thorcom.com Email: mike@thorcom.com
| |