[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: My thoughts on egcs+2.2 (do you care??)

On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Fact is, gcc/egcs needs to evolve. It has been stagnating way too long as
> things stand, IMHO. Sure, software will get hurt. Particularly software
> that was written very closely to the working (not documentation!) of

Well, since we are talking about egcs and gcc.. does anyone have an idea
of the reason for the size increase in executables on IA?

int main() {return 0;} (stripped)

gcc 2146 bytes
gcc 2.8.1 6168 bytes
ecc 1.1 8752 bytes

____/| Ragnar Hojland ( Fingerprint 94C4B
\ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822
U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.074 / U:8.728 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site