lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] jiffies wraparound [Re: 2.1.125 Show stopper list: Draft]
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:

>new implementation gets rid of the per-task timer and per-task timeout
>value. This effectively puts both of them onto the stack and thus probably
>improves performance even in the timeout case. And for the common

For some reason I am not sure if removing the timeout from the stack is
been a good idea.

My kernel is just running without tsk->timeout and using
schedule_timeout() though. I can' t produce a patch right now because I
need to clean tons of garbage and to do that I have to review all the
patch (if you want the patch with the garbage ask and I' ll sent to you).
If I boot with jiffies = 0 everything seems OK. If I boot with jiffies =
-120*HZ and timer_jiffies = -120*HZ the timer code became messy (before
and after the jiffies wrap). I don' t understand at all yet the details of
the timer code, but it seems that I can' t choose a random jiffies value
to start (I am complelty wrong on this?).

Andrea Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:1.822 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site