Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:21:35 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [patch] jiffies wraparound [Re: 2.1.125 Show stopper list: Draft] |
| |
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>shouldnt the (idx < 0xffffffffUL) condition be: (idx <= 0xffffffffUL)? > >Yes, thanks. > >Note that also the (expires < timer_jiffies) is wrong it should be >(signed long)idx<0.
And using (long)idx<0 we don' t need to worry about idx<~0UL but adding <= is more right since it make simpler to uderstand that we want to go ahead only in 64bit hardware.
Andrea Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |