lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Y2k - Is Linux Ready for the year 2000?
From
Date
>>>>> "RJ" == Richard B Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes:

RJ> On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Jason Wilkins wrote:
>> I need documentation concerning Linux's year 2000 compliancy, can anyone
>> point me to it?
>>
>> Jason Wilkins
>>
RJ> No Unix machine has a problem with the year 2000, no matter how poorly
RJ> it may have been implemented.

Machines physically have problems. The RTC for example, may not work.
This may be at least in part a kernel issue.

RJ> The problems, if they exist at all, are in __applications__ code! It is
RJ> very difficult to make application code using the 'C' runtime library,
RJ> that would not work beyond the year 2000. The year 2000 means nothing
RJ> special to Unix machines.

Wrong. date at least the old one I have will die in the year 2000.

RJ> Of course one could set the machine time and do a sample run, but
RJ> that would be too easy.

Easy test as you said set the machine time, and do a sample run and be
suprised at how much breaks.

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.082 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site