Messages in this thread | | | From | "Peter L Jones" <> | Subject | Re: Fw: Another fix for 2.0.31p9 smbfs | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 1997 20:53:42 +0100 |
| |
Volker,
I'm certain it's the user-space utilities. Of course, this would affect _all_ mount routines, so maybe a (argh, don't flame me! :-) kernel-space fix would be helpful? (Map option on the mount command or something?) I'm not sure what characters are valid in a Win95 machine name...
-- Peter
-----Original Message----- From: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE <Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE> To: pljones@earthling.net <pljones@earthling.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> Date: 15 September 1997 12:58 Subject: Re: Fw: Another fix for 2.0.31p9 smbfs
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Does the latest SMBFS support server names with spaces in them? >> (Currently, you can mount a resource on such a server but the >> system gets rather confused if you try and unmount it. Also, >> the fstab syntax prevent its use.) > >What gets confused? The kernel or the user-space utilities reading >/proc/mounts or /etc/mtab? Sorry, never tried it. > >Volker > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: 2.6.3i >Charset: noconv > >iQCVAwUBNB0hlD/9BWnmOc5FAQFGUAP/TxC9FQJIK8jo6oegGXwdXLR8aHBDRRGu >zjJl021/qrAF7YmbFK05fQFieZfNEwr2RGjRxbu1YdCNkHTphPa3ZtpmT7aYQRtS >p9bM+1qppgo6iVHRctwrBmU67vd7aR08BSMJwONkPEFB8r1BB2dVgPuc1esaRXMO >6LSeI8YZ+lU= >=GTjL >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
| |