lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Fw: Another fix for 2.0.31p9 smbfs
Date
Volker,

I'm certain it's the user-space utilities. Of course, this would affect
_all_ mount routines, so maybe a (argh, don't flame me! :-) kernel-space fix
would be helpful? (Map option on the mount command or something?) I'm not
sure what characters are valid in a Win95 machine name...

-- Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE <Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE>
To: pljones@earthling.net <pljones@earthling.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Date: 15 September 1997 12:58
Subject: Re: Fw: Another fix for 2.0.31p9 smbfs



>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>> Does the latest SMBFS support server names with spaces in them?
>> (Currently, you can mount a resource on such a server but the
>> system gets rather confused if you try and unmount it. Also,
>> the fstab syntax prevent its use.)
>
>What gets confused? The kernel or the user-space utilities reading
>/proc/mounts or /etc/mtab? Sorry, never tried it.
>
>Volker
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3i
>Charset: noconv
>
>iQCVAwUBNB0hlD/9BWnmOc5FAQFGUAP/TxC9FQJIK8jo6oegGXwdXLR8aHBDRRGu
>zjJl021/qrAF7YmbFK05fQFieZfNEwr2RGjRxbu1YdCNkHTphPa3ZtpmT7aYQRtS
>p9bM+1qppgo6iVHRctwrBmU67vd7aR08BSMJwONkPEFB8r1BB2dVgPuc1esaRXMO
>6LSeI8YZ+lU=
>=GTjL
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.038 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site