Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Jul 1997 22:42:51 -0400 (EDT) | From | Glenn Bily <> | Subject | Half a digest? |
| |
Attn: List maintainer:
Seems that I got 2 halves of a digest and apparently something missing out of the middle....anybody else get this? I recall a past message about some rogue L*tus N*tes server spewing....is this related?
One coming from where it was suppose to with no tailer and one apparently coming from the digest because of the message tail but with an improper return address.
Here are the mail headers:
First the one with the properly formed return address:
Return-Path: <owner-linux-kernel-digest-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu> Received: from postoffice.bellatlantic.net ([199.45.32.39]) by postoffice2.bellatlantic.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-11699) with ESMTP id AAA23709 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:49:01 -0400 Received: from pmdfsrv.bellatlantic.net ([199.45.32.45]) by postoffice.bellatlantic.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-36903U31000L2S100) with ESMTP id AAA29942 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:54:34 -0400 Received: from mail7.bellatlantic.net ([207.68.32.38]) by pmdfsrv.bellatlantic.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-0U10L2S100) with ESMTP id AAA18909 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:47:06 -0400 Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6]) by mail7.bellatlantic.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA12306 for <gbily@bellatlantic.net>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 20:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 20548]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <2718-3759>; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 04:48:34 +0300 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971160-8839>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:40:53 -0400 Errors-To: owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <19970727014053Z971160-8839+5471@vger.rutgers.edu>
From: owner-linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu To: linux-kernel-digest@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1031 Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:40:41 -0400
<blah blah blah and then> ------------------------------
From: colin@nyx.net (Colin Plumb) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 97 14:15:59 MDT Subject: Re: patch for fs/buffer.c get_unused_buffer_head
(End of message no tailer and incomplete message)
Then the second message:
Return-Path: <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> Return-Path: <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> Received: from jenolan.rutgers.edu by nyx.net (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13969; Sat, 26 Jul 97 13:59:22 MDT Received: (from davem@localhost) by jenolan.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA04521; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 16:00:23 -0400 Message-Id: <199707262000.QAA04521@jenolan.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: <9707261949.AA13637@nyx.net> (colin@nyx.net) Status: R
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 16:00:23 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> To: colin@nyx.net Cc: whawes@star.net, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: patch for fs/buffer.c get_unused_buffer_head
[ blah blah blah and the tailer appears]
------------------------------
End of linux-kernel-digest V1 #1031 ***********************************
[blah blah blah]
| |