Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 1997 10:17:09 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) | From | "W. Reilly Cooley" <> | Subject | Re: kernel structures 2.0.29->2.0.30 |
| |
So what do Linus, Alan, David, Ted, et al have to say about these ideas and criticisms? It's no use chattering about it unless they like it.
Wil
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>Maybe we need 3 streams:- > > 1. Stable bug fix only. The current 2.0.x as should be > > 2. Modest development. Additional features, ideally no external API > changes. [ie ISS, masq fixes]. Every so often (say 3 - 6 months), > this tree is used to make a new stable release from a version > that has been running solidly for a while. Changes here are also > fed up to the... > > 2. The developers playground. Supports everything (ipv12, telepathic > i/o, Intel ZX81 processor), but rarely works :-( At reasonable > points this is frozen, downshifted to the ongoing development > status, prior to release as the new stable version.
------------------------------------------------------------- W. Reilly Cooley NakedApe Consulting & Navi.Net representative 1509 NE 10th Ave., #104 Portland, OR 97232 503 287-2165 wcooley@navi.net www.navi.net/~wcooley www.navi.net/~nakedape
As a service, I provide analysis for viruses and poor grammar to senders of unsolicited commercial e-mail at a rate of US$250 per hour. Delivery of said correspondence constitutes a request for the aforementioned services at said price.
| |