Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Nov 1997 17:34:45 -0600 (CST) | From | Edward Welbon <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine... |
| |
No, sorry to say that I am not. I had fits with the 2940UW and am now using the Asus PCI-SC875. I have also used the the BusLogic BT-958. Others amy work also but the BT-958 seems to be the most reliable. The 2940UW is the fastest but liitle good that does when it is so (for me) unreliable. I was lucky, I managed to trade my 2940UW's for PCI-SC875's. The last test I did was to run 128 passes of Bonnie on a 2GB file size and not a peep did I hear, everything was peachy keen (I guess you can infer that I am *very* patient to have endured such a long bonnie test).
On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, BrianR wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 08:28:24 -0500 (EST) > From: BrianR <brianr@osiris.ml.org> > To: Edward Welbon <welbon@bga.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: 2.1.65 seems to work fine... > > On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Edward Welbon wrote: > > > 2.1.65 seems to work fine. I could not get 2.1.64 to boot. It seemed > > that I could not mount my raid0 as root. > > > > Any chance you're using that raid from an aic7xxx scsi controller? My > aic7xxx doesn't work at all -- locks up when I try to insmod it, or locks > up at boot time if I compile it in. > > -Brian Ristuccia > brianr@osiris.ml.org > bristucc@baynetworks.com > bristucc@cs.uml.edu >
Ed Welbon - welbon@bga.com In nature there is neither right or wrong, only consequences.
| |