Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 01 Nov 1997 01:44:24 -0500 (EST) | From | Dave Wreski <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability.. |
| |
On 31-Oct-97 "Lauri Tischler" wrote: > Anno Domini 31 Oct 97 at 9:20, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> In short, it wasn't really worth even fixing, looking back at the problems >> that fix then caused. A 2.0.32 with the memory leak would not be a >> disaster. > > Maybe I'm making myself an asshole once again, but isn't it a bit > arrogant to say that memory leak (any memory leak) is not worth of > fixing? How do you classify 'non-disastrous' leak ? > Cheers..
I think I agree with you, but also fear I'm making myself an asshole again..
Does 2.1.x also have memory problems? Any chance of starting to produce a current problem report in the 2.1 patches, so we know what to expect when using 2.1? It kinda sucks having 64M, and not even having enough memory to format a floppy..
| |