lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability..

On 31-Oct-97 "Lauri Tischler" wrote:
> Anno Domini 31 Oct 97 at 9:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> In short, it wasn't really worth even fixing, looking back at the problems
>> that fix then caused. A 2.0.32 with the memory leak would not be a
>> disaster.
>
> Maybe I'm making myself an asshole once again, but isn't it a bit
> arrogant to say that memory leak (any memory leak) is not worth of
> fixing? How do you classify 'non-disastrous' leak ?
> Cheers..

I think I agree with you, but also fear I'm making myself an asshole again..

Does 2.1.x also have memory problems? Any chance of starting to produce a
current problem report in the 2.1 patches, so we know what to expect when using
2.1? It kinda sucks having 64M, and not even having enough memory to format a
floppy..


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.051 / U:28.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site