Messages in this thread | | | From | "Lauri Tischler" <> | Date | Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:08:09 GMT +0200 | Subject | Re: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability.. |
| |
Anno Domini 31 Oct 97 at 9:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In short, it wasn't really worth even fixing, looking back at the problems > that fix then caused. A 2.0.32 with the memory leak would not be a > disaster.
Maybe I'm making myself an asshole once again, but isn't it a bit arrogant to say that memory leak (any memory leak) is not worth of fixing? How do you classify 'non-disastrous' leak ? Cheers..
| |