lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability..
Anno Domini 31 Oct 97 at 9:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> In short, it wasn't really worth even fixing, looking back at the problems
> that fix then caused. A 2.0.32 with the memory leak would not be a
> disaster.

Maybe I'm making myself an asshole once again, but isn't it a bit
arrogant to say that memory leak (any memory leak) is not worth of
fixing? How do you classify 'non-disastrous' leak ?
Cheers..

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.040 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site