lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability..
On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Adam McKee wrote:

> > At least, I'll have a chance to try out all the jucy patches that are only
> > being maintained for the stable kernel (like raid[1,5] and QNX (the 2.1
> > ver dies with SMP) and others)..
>
> I'll see about fixing the 2.1 QNX patch. It may just be a locking issue.
> What is the exact manner of death with 2.1 SMP? What really hurts is I
> don't have an SMP box. I'm always tempted to get one, and I always wuss
> out when I see how expensive the mainboards are. Looks like SMP is going
> to be pretty sweet with 2.2 though -- I may just bite the bullet next time
> I go hardware shopping.

When I tried with .54 I got an instant opps on boot in the scheduler,
before any processes fork.

I didn't feel like copying down the opps, so I can't tell you more.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.051 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site