Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 22 Jan 1997 20:38:17 -0800 (PST) | From | (news) |
| |
Newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel Path: usenet From: grep@calvin.oriole.sbay.org (George Bonser) Subject: Re: Linux vs. NT for Developers To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Sender: usenet@oriole.sbay.org (news) References: <5c3o17$um6@server.sae.extern.fh-hannover.de> X-No-Archive: yes X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The Unknown Organization Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <E4G27r.I88@oriole.sbay.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 04:38:15 GMT
In article <5c3o17$um6@server.sae.extern.fh-hannover.de>, Juergen Sauer <jojo@sae.extern.fh-hannover.de> writes: > > --- not any C2 certification at all +++ C2 certified, if the NT is > Nobody did pay for this certify not connected to a Network, and > has no Diskdrive >
Huh? Uhm, if the NT has no disk, and is not connected to a network... oh, nevermind.
-- George Bonser grep@oriole.sbay.org, grep@cris.com
|  |