Messages in this thread | | | Date | 27 Jul 96 11:07:13 EDT | From | PATRICK MAIN <> | Subject | EVEN MORE 2.0 vs 1.2 and INN config. |
| |
>> Sender: thomas@melchior.cuivre.fdn.fr Received: from yoda.fdn.org (yoda.fdn.org [193.55.4.50]) by dub-img-5.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id IAA18603; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:36:19 -0400 Received: from melchior.cuivre.fdn.fr (cuivre.fdn.fr [194.57.210.12]) by yoda.fdn.org (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA07258; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 14:36:06 +0200 Received: (from thomas@localhost) by melchior.cuivre.fdn.fr (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA02140 Fri, 26 Jul 1996 14:36:18 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fdn.fr> Message-Id: <Gibolin-199607261236.OAA02140@melchior.cuivre.fdn.fr> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: 2.0 ns 1.2 and INN config. To: 72254.3077@compuserve.com (Patrick Main) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 14:36:18 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: thomas@cuivre.fdn.fr, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960726093702.00687e54@amaranth.com> from Patrick Main at "Jul 26, 96 06:37:02 am" MIME-Version: 1.0 Thomas,
>>I have just checked, and the file on the server is OK >> Most probably, you web browser automatically >>uncompressed the file (it is compressed with GNU gzip.
I was able to get the file and ungzip it finally from your site at at your <URL:http://Web.FdN.FR/~tquinot/inn.html> However i had to use Linux to fetch it. Hmmmm.... for some reason Win95, Netscape 2.02 and win95 ppp dial-up results in a corrupted file. I frequently use this to "fetch" other files with no problems?? ISP iss on T1 through ATT <should be good> why it i corrupted is unknown to me. will investigate further...
Now for the subject line: Thanks for posting your config.data.... now the questions ;-)
But first a suggestion, i noticed your path to overview iss the same as distributed. From FAQ4 and the NOV faq they advise placing the overview files in a directory separate from the news directory with a standard location becoming /path-to-news-spool/over.view
Questions on your config.data settings vs Debian and FAQ suggestions 1. you have USE_CHAR_CONST DUNNO, Debian and the FAQ suggests DO .... maybe should be DO <?>
2. what is the type of an object size ..usually size_t or unsigned int you have SIZE_T size_t The Faq also has size_t while Debian uses int .... size_t may be right <?>
3. for file locking , LOCK_STYLE select NONE, FLOCK, FCNTL or LOCKF you have FCNTL, Debian also has FCNTL while the FAQ suggests using FLOCK .... wonder which is best if it matters <?>
4. for use waitpid instead of wait3 <?> you have HAVE_WAITPID DONT both the FAQ and Debian sets this to DO..... is DO the correct choice <?>
5. for how to fork pick FOR or VFORK you have FORK vfork ..... and also set HAVE_VFORK DO both the FAQ and Debian set FORK for and HAVE_VFORK DONT what is the difference and is fork the correct choice for 2.0 <?> i recall that 1.2.xx INN used vfork as you do. has this maybe changed for 2.0?
6. for "does AF_UNIX use sizeof for the socket size" you have BIND_USE_SIZEOF DO as does Debian too! while the FAQ say to et this to DONT... maybe for 2.0 hould be DO <?>
7. everybody agrees that close on exec needs FCNTL and not IOCTL but for "how should non-blocking I/O be done" you have NBIO_STYLE FCNTL as does also DEBIAN while the FAQ says to use IOCTL...maybe FCNTL is correct "NOW" <?>
8. for "how to get number of available descripters" select from GETDTAB, GETRLIMIT, SYSCONF, ULIMIT, CONSTANT! you have FDCOUNT_STYLE GETRLIMIT as does Debian! The FAQ says to use SYSCONF as does and INN setup for 1.2.13 i have no idea but think maybe 2.0 allows GETRLIMIT now <?>
9. for "what predicate <ctype.h> macros need you have CTYPE isXXXXX((c)) which is also suggested by the FAQ DEBIAN uses (isascii((c)) && ixXXXXX((c))) .... i don't have any idea <?>
10. that actually does it now...all are using MMAP and UNIX DOMAIN SOCKETS
E-mail from: Patrick Main, 27-Jul-1996
| |