[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.2.0 wishlist
At 04:03 AM 6/15/96 +0200, you wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Matti E Aarnio wrote:
>> > > I think you may have a tough time finding that. Supposedly, NTFS is a c1
>> > > (supposedly soon to be c2) secure file system, which means that no OS
>> > > except for NT is supposed to be able to read/write from it.
>> No, Win-NT WITHOUT NETWORKING may be able to get C1 classification,
>> and perhaps even C2, if MS implements all the necessary audit trail

Perhaps? Window NT 3.5 has been certified C2 [PAST TENSE].

>> of the disk reveals anything is by use of the encryption, and
>> the NTFS is NOT encrypted!

This is not needed for C2. I know yall love microsoft bashing, but
faulting them for this is baseless. [And no i dont work for them :)].


>So I still thing it would be nice with NTFS r/w support in some of the
>comming kernel versions.

That's what I [and hopefully others who will join] are workin' on :).

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.050 / U:1.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site