Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 15 Jun 1996 04:35:59 -0400 | From | The SethMeister <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0 wishlist |
| |
At 04:03 AM 6/15/96 +0200, you wrote: > >On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Matti E Aarnio wrote: > >> > > I think you may have a tough time finding that. Supposedly, NTFS is a c1 >> > > (supposedly soon to be c2) secure file system, which means that no OS >> > > except for NT is supposed to be able to read/write from it. >> >> No, Win-NT WITHOUT NETWORKING may be able to get C1 classification, >> and perhaps even C2, if MS implements all the necessary audit trail >...
Perhaps? Window NT 3.5 has been certified C2 [PAST TENSE].
>> of the disk reveals anything is by use of the encryption, and >> the NTFS is NOT encrypted! >
This is not needed for C2. I know yall love microsoft bashing, but faulting them for this is baseless. [And no i dont work for them :)].
-S
>So I still thing it would be nice with NTFS r/w support in some of the >comming kernel versions.
That's what I [and hopefully others who will join] are workin' on :).
|  |