Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 27 May 1996 17:40:46 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Eyvind W Bernhardsen <> | Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Quantum Mechanics |
| |
On Mon, 27 May 1996, Bryn Paul Arnold Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 1996, Eyvind W Bernhardsen wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 May 1996, Mike Wangsmo wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > The gist of all of that is that if the force field is sufficently stong > > > enough and the object (maybe a curved light beam???) can reach the same > > > > Light doesn't curve. Light, by definition, travels in a straight line. > > Light, also by definition, always travels the shortest distance between > > two points. Therefore, > > Space can curve (a gravity well), and light follows a straight path in > curved space. Therefore what ?
Therefore, I decided I couldn't be bothered to look this up, and bailed on the thread. Unfortunately, C-x k RET doesn't work quite as well in Pine as it does in Emacs. Anyway, since I've started, I may as well finish; since there would be a path around the force field that would be shorter than the path through the force field, light would take that (curved) path as opposed to the straight one. Or, to put it another way, space would curve around the force field. 'course, I haven't been paying much attention to this thread, so who am I to say anything? :)
Eyvind Bernhardsen
|  |