Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 28 May 1996 18:52:58 +0200 | From | "Dr. Werner Fink" <> | Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Quantum Mechanics |
| |
> Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 15:06:27 +0200 (MET DST) > From: Eyvind W Bernhardsen <eyvind@stud.unit.no> > > On Sat, 25 May 1996, Mike Wangsmo wrote: > > [...] > > > The gist of all of that is that if the force field is sufficently stong > > enough and the object (maybe a curved light beam???) can reach the same > > Light doesn't curve. Light, by definition, travels in a straight line. > Light, also by definition, always travels the shortest distance between > two points. Therefore, > > > point accross the cone base in a shorter periord of time, however has > > covered more distance. That translate into an object exceeding the speed > > of light and a relative setting. This doesn't violate the theory of > > relativity since no claim about the object exceeding the speed of light > > in the same reference frame is made. A corralary to this theory could > > also be postulated as having the velocity of a light beam accelerated by > > a *sling shot* type of action rounding a gravitational field. By doing > > this, the so called fixed speed of light can also be increased and I > > thing with a little bit of work, it could be shown to be unbounded. > > > > Just a few thoughts. > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Mike Wangsmo, Graduate Student wanger@fubar.cs.montana.edu > > Dept. of M&IE, MSU http://www.cs.montana.edu/~wanger > > Bozeman, MT 59717 (406) 586-0690 > > "May the Force be with you, always" > > > > > > Eyvind Bernhardsen > >
Hmmm -- there is no FDDI working ....
Werner
|  |