Messages in this thread | | | From | "Ulrich Windl" <> | Date | Fri, 12 Apr 1996 13:37:55 +0100 | Subject | Re: linux/net/core should be renamed |
| |
On 12 Apr 96 at 2:31, jerijian@seas.ucla.edu wrote:
> A warning to all: this is a religious topic. > > I believe that the linux/net/core directory in the Linux > kernel source tree should be renamed to something else, in case > make or gcc decides to segfault in that directory and try to > produce a "core" (!) file.
CVS makes trouble, too (by default). > (Still, doesn't this imply having a LARGE patch just > to move the files to a dir. with a different name? I wonder...) > > -- > Arthur D. Jerijian \ The opinions expressed in this message are mine > One man, one sinner \ only, and not UCLA's. > jerijian@seas.ucla.edu \ Go Wolves! http://coke.physics.ucla.edu/ > adj@ucla.edu \ laptag/VanNuys.dir/vnhs.html > >
| |