lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.0.24 clock unstable ?
Date
Followup to:  <Pine.BSI.3.95.961105090328.5570B-100000@cloud9.net>
By author: John Alvord <jalvo@cloud9.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> There was a classic moment reported in early Windows 95, where a routine
> is supposed to handle time changes automatically. At 2am, the clock was
> reset to 1am. And an hour later the same thing happened. And so on until
> the machine was restarted.
>
> Does Linux or some experimental patch attempt a siniliar time change?
>

Linux doesn't deal with this sort of bogosity -- it keeps the system
time in UTC, and converts to local time as needed. Someone put in a
patch to handle DST changes for filesystems (e.g. MS-DOS) that require
the kernel to know the local time; IMHO a much better idea would be to
have a user-space daemon (which has access to the timezone tables) do
that change.

-hpa
--
Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape or form.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.137 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site