Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jiapeng Chong <> | Subject | [PATCH v2] wifi: rtw89: Remove the redundant else branch in the function rtw89_phy_get_kpath | Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:29:22 +0800 |
| |
The assignment of the else and if branches is the same in the "case: MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF" branch of the function rtw89_phy_get_kpath, so we remove it and add comments here to make the code easier to understand.
/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c:6406:2-4: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else).
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=8812 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> --- Changes in v2: -Add code comments, modify commit subject, and content description.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c index eaa18140d1a8..a82b4c56a6f4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c @@ -6403,10 +6403,8 @@ enum rtw89_rf_path_bit rtw89_phy_get_kpath(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, return RF_D; case MLO_0_PLUS_2_1RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF: - if (phy_idx == RTW89_PHY_0) - return RF_AB; - else - return RF_AB; + /* for both PHY 0/1 */ + return RF_AB; case MLO_0_PLUS_2_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_2_2RF: -- 2.20.1.7.g153144c
| |