lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch V2 07/50] posix-cpu-timers: Split up posix_cpu_timer_get()
On 04/17, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On 04/11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> In preparation for addressing issues in the timer_get() and timer_set()
> >> functions of posix CPU timers.
> >
> > Cough... I must have missed something, but posix_cpu_timer_get()
> > doesn't look right with or without this trivial patch.
> >
> > It doesn't initialize itp->it_value if cpu_timer_getexpires() == 0,
> > this means that sys_timer_gettime() will copy the uninitialized
> > cur_setting->it_value on the stack to userspace?
>
> The initialization of itp is already done by the callsites.
> do_timer_settime() in posix-timers.c as well as do_cpu_nanosleep() in
> posix-cpu-timers.c execute a memset before calling
> posix_cpu_timer_get().

Indeed. Somehow I missed this memset(). Even if I tried to read the
simple do_timer_gettime/posix_cpu_timer_get functions several times ;)

Thanks for correcting me!

Oleg.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-17 13:09    [W:0.129 / U:3.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site