lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: REGRESSION: lockdep warning triggered by 15b9ce7ecd: virtio_balloon: stay awake while adjusting balloon
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:50 AM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi, while doing final testing before sending a pull request, I merged
> in linux-next, and commit 5b9ce7ecd7: virtio_balloon: stay awake while
> adjusting balloon seems to be causing a lockdep warning (see attached)
> when running gce-xfstests on a Google Compute Engine e2 VM. I was not
> able to trigger it using kvm-xfstests, but the following command:
> "gce-xfstests -C 10 ext4/4k generic/476) was sufficient to triger the
> problem. For more information please see [1] and [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/gce-xfstests.md
> [2] https://thunk.org/gce-xfstests
>
> I found it by looking at the git logs, and this commit aroused my
> suspicions, and I further testing showed that the lockdep warning was
> reproducible with this commit, but not when testing with the
> immediately preceeding commit (15b9ce7ecd^).
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Ted
>
>
> root: ext4/4k run xfstest generic/476
> systemd[1]: Started fstests-generic-476.scope - /usr/bin/bash -c test -w /proc/self/oom_score_adj && echo 250 > /proc/self/oom_score_adj; exec ./tests/generic/476.
> kernel: [ 399.361181] EXT4-fs (dm-1): mounted filesystem 840e25bd-f650-4819-8562-7eded85ef370 r/w with ordered data mode. Quota mode: none.
> systemd[1]: fstests-generic-476.scope: Deactivated successfully.
> systemd[1]: fstests-generic-476.scope: Consumed 3min 1.966s CPU time.
> systemd[1]: xt\x2dvdb.mount: Deactivated successfully.
> kernel: [ 537.085404] EXT4-fs (dm-0): unmounting filesystem d3d7a675-f7b6-4384-abec-2e60d885b6da.
> systemd[1]: xt\x2dvdc.mount: Deactivated successfully.
> kernel: [ 540.565870]
> kernel: [ 540.567523] ================================
> kernel: [ 540.572007] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
> kernel: [ 540.576407] 6.7.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep-00012-g5b9ce7ecd715 #318 Not tainted
> kernel: [ 540.583532] --------------------------------
> kernel: [ 540.587928] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
> kernel: [ 540.594326] kworker/0:3/329 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> kernel: [ 540.599955] ffff90b280a548c0 (&vb->adjustment_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: update_balloon_size_func+0x33/0x190
> kernel: [ 540.609926] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
> kernel: [ 540.614935] __lock_acquire+0x3f2/0xb30
> kernel: [ 540.618992] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
> kernel: [ 540.622786] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x90
> kernel: [ 540.627366] virtballoon_changed+0x51/0xd0
> kernel: [ 540.631947] virtio_config_changed+0x5a/0x70
> kernel: [ 540.636437] vp_config_changed+0x11/0x20
> kernel: [ 540.640576] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x230
> kernel: [ 540.645500] handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
> kernel: [ 540.649558] handle_edge_irq+0x8f/0x1f0
> kernel: [ 540.653791] __common_interrupt+0x47/0xf0
> kernel: [ 540.658106] common_interrupt+0x79/0xa0
> kernel: [ 540.661672] EXT4-fs (dm-1): unmounting filesystem 840e25bd-f650-4819-8562-7eded85ef370.
> kernel: [ 540.663183] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
> kernel: [ 540.663190] acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x30
> kernel: [ 540.663196] acpi_idle_enter+0x7b/0xd0
> kernel: [ 540.663199] cpuidle_enter_state+0x90/0x4f0
> kernel: [ 540.688723] cpuidle_enter+0x2d/0x40
> kernel: [ 540.692516] cpuidle_idle_call+0xe4/0x120
> kernel: [ 540.697036] do_idle+0x84/0xd0
> kernel: [ 540.700393] cpu_startup_entry+0x2a/0x30
> kernel: [ 540.704588] rest_init+0xe9/0x180
> kernel: [ 540.708118] arch_call_rest_init+0xe/0x30
> kernel: [ 540.712426] start_kernel+0x41c/0x4b0
> kernel: [ 540.716310] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
> kernel: [ 540.721164] x86_64_start_kernel+0x8c/0x90
> kernel: [ 540.725737] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x178/0x17b
> kernel: [ 540.731432] irq event stamp: 22681
> kernel: [ 540.734956] hardirqs last enabled at (22681): [<ffffffff8b4b5158>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50
> kernel: [ 540.744564] hardirqs last disabled at (22680): [<ffffffff8b4b4ded>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x5d/0x90
> kernel: [ 540.753475] softirqs last enabled at (22076): [<ffffffff8a58cfa1>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x101/0x1c0
> kernel: [ 540.762904] softirqs last disabled at (22072): [<ffffffff8a58cfa1>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x101/0x1c0
> kernel: [ 540.773298]
> kernel: [ 540.773298] other info that might help us debug this:
> kernel: [ 540.780207] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> kernel: [ 540.780207]
> kernel: [ 540.786438] CPU0
> kernel: [ 540.789007] ----
> kernel: [ 540.791766] lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> kernel: [ 540.796014] <Interrupt>
> kernel: [ 540.798778] lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> kernel: [ 540.803605]

Oh, that's embarrassing, I completely whiffed on interactions with
interrupts. The following patch fixes it, and I've locally repro'ed
the issue and verified the fix. What's the process for getting this
fix merged? Does it get merged as a seperatch patch, or squashed into
the original commit?

From a99a1efa6a2b470a98ea2c87e58bebe90ce329a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:41:21 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix interrupt context deadlock

Use _irq spinlock functions with the adjustment_lock, since
start_update_balloon_size needs to acquire it in an interrupt context.

Fixes: 5b9ce7ecd715 ("virtio_balloon: stay awake while adjusting balloon")
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index aa6a1a649ad6..1f5b3dd31fcf 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
@@ -459,12 +459,12 @@ static void start_update_balloon_size(struct
virtio_balloon *vb)

static void end_update_balloon_size(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
{
- spin_lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
if (!vb->adjustment_signal_pending && vb->adjustment_in_progress) {
vb->adjustment_in_progress = false;
pm_relax(vb->vdev->dev.parent);
}
- spin_unlock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
}

static void virtballoon_changed(struct virtio_device *vdev)
@@ -506,9 +506,9 @@ static void update_balloon_size_func(struct
work_struct *work)
vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
update_balloon_size_work);

- spin_lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
vb->adjustment_signal_pending = false;
- spin_unlock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);

diff = towards_target(vb);

--
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-01-09 06:51    [W:0.030 / U:1.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site