Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Raag Jadav <> | Subject | [PATCH v2] ACPI: LPSS: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for matching _UID | Date | Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:03:35 +0530 |
| |
Now that we have a standard ACPI helper, we can use acpi_dev_uid_match() for matching _UID as per the original logic before commit 2a036e489eb1 ("ACPI: LPSS: Refactor _UID handling to use acpi_dev_uid_to_integer()"), instead of treating it as an integer.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> --- Changes since v1: - Update commit message
drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c index 875de44961bf..6aaa6b066510 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c @@ -167,10 +167,8 @@ static struct pwm_lookup byt_pwm_lookup[] = { static void byt_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) { - u64 uid; - /* Only call pwm_add_table for the first PWM controller */ - if (acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) || uid != 1) + if (!acpi_dev_uid_match(pdata->adev, "1")) return; pwm_add_table(byt_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(byt_pwm_lookup)); @@ -218,10 +216,8 @@ static struct pwm_lookup bsw_pwm_lookup[] = { static void bsw_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) { - u64 uid; - /* Only call pwm_add_table for the first PWM controller */ - if (acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) || uid != 1) + if (!acpi_dev_uid_match(pdata->adev, "1")) return; pwm_add_table(bsw_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(bsw_pwm_lookup)); base-commit: f9c7f9d537da013471e5c7913a33b6489bdeb3cf -- 2.17.1
| |