Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Subject | [PATCH] seq_buf: fix a misleading comment | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:38:49 -0600 |
| |
The comment for seq_buf_has_overflowed() says that an overflow condition is marked by len == size, but that's not what the code is testing. Make the comment match reality.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> --- include/linux/seq_buf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h index 515d7fcb9634..026302765494 100644 --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ seq_buf_init(struct seq_buf *s, char *buf, unsigned int size) /* * seq_buf have a buffer that might overflow. When this happens - * the len and size are set to be equal. + * len is set to be greater than size. */ static inline bool seq_buf_has_overflowed(struct seq_buf *s) -- 2.41.0
| |