Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:48:52 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 05/25] powerpc/secvar: Warn and error if multiple secvar ops are set | From | Stefan Berger <> |
| |
On 1/31/23 01:39, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > From: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> > > The secvar code only supports one consumer at a time. > > Multiple consumers aren't possible at this point in time, but we'd want > it to be obvious if it ever could happen. > > Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> > Co-developed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> > > --- > > v4: Return an error and don't actually try to set secvar_operations if the > warning is triggered (npiggin) > > v5: Drop "extern" to fix a checkpatch check (snowpatch) > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/secvar.h | 4 ++-- > arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c | 8 ++++++-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-secvar.c | 4 +--- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/secvar.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/secvar.h > index 07ba36f868a7..a2b5f2203dc5 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/secvar.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/secvar.h > @@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ struct secvar_operations { > > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SECURE_BOOT > > -extern void set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops); > +int set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops); > > #else > > -static inline void set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops) { } > +static inline int set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops) { return 0; } > > #endif > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c > index 6a29777d6a2d..9c8dd4e7c270 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c > @@ -8,10 +8,14 @@ > > #include <linux/cache.h> > #include <asm/secvar.h> > +#include <asm/bug.h> > > -const struct secvar_operations *secvar_ops __ro_after_init; > +const struct secvar_operations *secvar_ops __ro_after_init = NULL; > > -void set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops) > +int set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops) > { > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(secvar_ops)) > + return -1;
The calling function opal_secvar_probe() returns an errno (-ENODEV for example). Return also an errno here?
> secvar_ops = ops; > + return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-secvar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-secvar.c > index ef89861569e0..4c0a3b030fe0 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-secvar.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-secvar.c > @@ -113,9 +113,7 @@ static int opal_secvar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENODEV;
This is the errno. > } > > - set_secvar_ops(&opal_secvar_ops); > - > - return 0; > + return set_secvar_ops(&opal_secvar_ops);
Stefan
| |