Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix wrong error return in rxrpc_connect_call() | Date | Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:07:15 +0000 |
| |
Fix rxrpc_connect_call() to return -ENOMEM rather than 0 if it fails to look up a peer.
This generated a smatch warning: net/rxrpc/call_object.c:303 rxrpc_connect_call() warn: missing error code 'ret'
I think this also fixes a syzbot-found bug:
rxrpc: Assertion failed - 1(0x1) == 11(0xb) is false ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/call_object.c:645!
where the call being put is in the wrong state - as would be the case if we failed to clear up correctly after the error in rxrpc_connect_call().
Fixes: 9d35d880e0e4 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+4bb6356bb29d6299360e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202301111153.9eZRYLf1-lkp@intel.com/ --- net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c index 3ded5a24627c..f3c9f0201c15 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void rxrpc_put_call_slot(struct rxrpc_call *call) static int rxrpc_connect_call(struct rxrpc_call *call, gfp_t gfp) { struct rxrpc_local *local = call->local; - int ret = 0; + int ret = -ENOMEM; _enter("{%d,%lx},", call->debug_id, call->user_call_ID);
| |