Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:30:58 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction |
| |
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:19:07PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need > to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O > be unrolled, etc.
Yeah, I believe this would be better done for you guys, ontop, as you know best what needs to be queried where. So this first patch adding only a stub should be fine. Or you or someone else does the conversion ontop of the Intel patch and then all patches go together.
Thx.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |