Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction | From | "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <> | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 2021 11:29:40 -0700 |
| |
On 6/2/21 11:19 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need > to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O > be unrolled, etc.
For AMD following cases should be true right? I can fix it in next version.
case VM_UNROLL_STRING_IO: case VM_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT:
-- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer
| |