lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mailbox: add control_by_sw for mt8195
Hi, Jason:

jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> 於 2021年12月10日 週五 下午2:11寫道:
>
> To make sure the GCE request signal to SPM is not trigger by
> other HW modules and cause suspend premature wake.
>
> Set 0x7 (the bit 0~2 as 1) to GCE_GCTL_VALUE, to configure the
> request signal control by SW and release the request to SPM.

How does mt8173, mt8183, and mt6779 prevent this? Or these SoCs could
not prevent this?

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index a8845b162dbf..342b91f16e65 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v5 = {
> static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v6 = {
> .thread_nr = 24,
> .shift = 3,
> - .control_by_sw = false,
> + .control_by_sw = true,
> .gce_num = 2
> };
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-10 16:45    [W:0.040 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site