lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd
Date
When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 9642971e89ce..457854765983 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
if (rc) {
WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
- return rc;
+ goto free_skb_resp;
}

rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
--
2.17.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-23 09:25    [W:0.033 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site